Saturday, January 16, 2021
  • About Us
  • ImagiNATION
  • Adverts
  • Rate Card
  • Contact Us
The Nation Online
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Columns Cut the Chaff

Is Admarc a money laundering operation?

by Ephraim Munthali
25/08/2018
in Cut the Chaff
4 min read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedinLinkedinShare via Email

That the Agricultural Development and Marketing Corporation (Admarc) is one of the most inefficient public institutions in Malawi is a no-brainer.

Admarc has this rare and extraordinary gift of making losses in almost every commercial endeavour it indulges itself in or has been pushed by its political masters at Capital Hill to carry out.

RelatedHeadlines

How AHL Group was brought to its knees

The making of a dictator

Lazarus ‘Vilemi Dazi’ Chakwera’: Here today, there tomorrow

As I write this, the State-owned grain trader is the proud owner of a chain of ‘markets’ where nothing is really traded.

If I had my way, most of the hundreds of Admarc infrastructure littered across the country would be sold while they still have some value because the majority of them are falling apart for lack of maintenance and usage.

The national embarrassment that is Admarc cannot even carryout its role as a heavily subsidised buyer and seller of farm produce.

Instead, all it has become is a personal playground of State presidents and his or her coterie. It is amazing that Admarc remains stuck in the past; its nostalgia of the 1970-1989 days of false glory surprisingly continues to inform its business model and decisions today.

In those days, the grain trader had exclusive market rights with no one competing with it—there were no traders around the country mounting their little scales and buying produce from farmers. Indeed there were no major private produce companies then to challenge it.

Those were the days when the public sector was almost the only major economic player. I mean, in the 1980s, there were about 35 State-run players that constituted about 25 percent of Malawi’s gross domestic product.

And that was minus Press Corporation Limited (PCL), which at the time was seen as a personal enterprise of the dictator president Hastings Kamuzu Banda and which singularly controlled at least 50 percent of the national economy.

But then, the line was always blurred between what Kamuzu Banda supposedly owned and what belonged to the State, so we can safely say that 85 percent of the economy (PCL’s 50 percent plus 35 percent of formal State enterprises) was in the hands of the State and its ruling patriarch.

The rest of what remained of the economy was spread mostly among business tycoons who were members of or made their money out of their association with the then ruling Malawi Congress Party while posing as self-made private sector players.

These business titans would do the regime’s bidding, including not starting businesses that would compete directly with Admarc, for example.

Consequently, Admarc, with its seasonal and territorial price uniformity model would make profits in most of its markets and cross-subsidise those that were struggling to make money.

Things were working until the United Democratic Front (UDF) regime under Bakili Muluzi liberalised the produce market just as it did with the rest of the economy under the package of structural adjustment programmes.

Sensing the danger Admarc would be in, various administrations—from Muluzi to Bingu wa Mutharika to Joyce Banda and Peter Mutharika—all tried, half-heartedly of course, to go for Admarc’s radical restructuring and reform, but they have all failed miserably or, most likely, did not want to succeed in the first place.

In the end, the country is still saddled with a behemoth of a shell company that gets billions of taxpayers’ money from Treasury, burns it away in corruption, fraud and political appeasement without regret and shamelessly goes back for more.

In fact, it could be argued that Admarc has become a vehicle for laundering money moved from Treasury in the name of subsidising maize buying maize to politically connected business people who end up being the ones supplying and/or transporting the grain from the parastatal through dubious contracts at inflated prices.

Is it any wonder that the parastatal churns out inexplicably high operating costs—including ridiculous transportation and vehicle maintenance expenses—that its shareholder, government through Treasury, pays a blind eye to?

Furthermore, various administrations have politicised its operations and pricing structure that are now costing billions, including the more than K10 billion that Admarc is set to lose simply because, first, government stopped it from exporting maize at a healthy margin when it had the chance and, second, after Capitol Hill instructed it to cut maize prices by 44 percent for reasons every official we have talked to is bungling through.

Indeed, the cronyism, politicisation and outright carelessness with the people’s money has built an institution that just does not care about covering its costs.

As Admarc stands now, it is not making any useful contribution to the growth and development of any self-sustaining agricultural market in Malawi. If anything, the parastatal is working hard to confuse the market while siphoning money from the taxpayer that ends up clean in the pockets of those linked to power.

So, when all the chaff is gone, the fact is that the political, administrative and humanitarian imperatives that are being abused to maintain a fake sense of relevance for Admarc must be unmasked for what they are: a large and systematic money laundering operation that must be dismantled.

Previous Post

‘We are equally relevant politically’

Next Post

A nation of political violence

Related Posts

An imposing AHL Group headquarters in Lilongwe
Cut the Chaff

How AHL Group was brought to its knees

January 16, 2021
Cut the Chaff

The making of a dictator

January 9, 2021
Pledged to review Cabinet: Chakwera
Cut the Chaff

Lazarus ‘Vilemi Dazi’ Chakwera’: Here today, there tomorrow

December 5, 2020
Next Post

A nation of political violence

Trending Stories

  • Chakwera: No comment

    Covid-19 mars cabinet review

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Locked with hubby’s brother

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Unscrupulous traders dupe unsuspecting farmers

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Tonse owes ‘ife tonse’ an apology

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Hospitals in crisis

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Opinions and Columns

Bottom Up

For 20 Pounds John Chilembwe was betrayed

January 16, 2021
My Diary

Tonse owes ‘ife tonse’ an apology

January 16, 2021
Off the Shelf

Accomplices in genocide

January 16, 2021
Back Bencher

On verge of collapse due to Covid-19

January 16, 2021
  • Values
  • Our Philosophy
  • Editorial policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism disclaimer
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2021 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation

© 2020 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

WhatsApp us

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.