Sunday, January 24, 2021
  • About Us
  • ImagiNATION
  • Adverts
  • Rate Card
  • Contact Us
The Nation Online
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Front Page

Lawyers’ fees in appeal case

by Lucky Mkandawire
28/03/2020
in Front Page, National News
6 min read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedinLinkedinShare via Email
  • Demand K348m from APM, MEC in preliminary appeal case

As petitioners and respondents in the elections case brace for the commencement of hearing of the appeal case set for April 15, they are now in court tussling over costs for the latter’s first loss.

The petitioners’ lawyers are claiming K348 million as legal fees for a preliminary appeal case, which President Peter Mutharika and the Malawi Electoral Commission (MEC) as first and second appellants, respectively, filed at the Supreme Court of Appeal on June 12 2019 to have the case of the presidential election thrown out at the Constitutional Court.

RelatedHeadlines

AG disowns K750m compensation signature

court rebuffs apm on frozen account

Expert cautions police on Covid-19 rules enforcement

court | The Nation Online
Some of the lawyers during the ConCourt elections case hearing in Lilongwe

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed the application on June 22 2019, paving the way for the Constitutional Court to start hearing the case until February 3 2020 when it nullified the May 21 2019 presidential election results, thus overturning Mutharika’s win with 38 percent of the total votes.

Chilima’s lead lawyer in the case, Chikosa Silungwe, confirmed filing the application after they failed to agree with the commission on the payable amount within 14 days as ordered by the court on February 3 in the historic presidential election nullification case.

Meanwhile, the 12 lawyers for the two petitioners have also filed an application requesting High Court and Supreme Court of Appeal registrar Agnes Patemba to assess and determine legal costs to be settled by MEC. However, the court is yet to set a date for hearing of the matter.

election case | The Nation Online
Petitioners’ lawyers filed an application after they failed to agree with MEC

The K348 million which MEC and Mutharika will jointly foot is a small fraction of the money taxpayers are expected to folk out on behalf of MEC to the same lawyers after they successfully defended Chakwera and Chilima in the presidential election nullification petition which ran for eight months.

But in the February 3 2020 judgement, the ConCourt ordered MEC to pay the legal costs for the petitioners while Mutharika was directed to pay own legal costs.

On June 12 2019, Mutharika and MEC filed a Notice of Preliminary Application at the Constitutional Court for an order that the presidential election petition filed by Chakwera and Chilima be struck out for being filed “irregularly” and “illegally”.

In their submissions, MEC lawyers argued that the petitions by Chakwera and Chilima were irregular and illegally because they were filed outside the stipulated seven-day period after voting.

MCP lawyers 1 | The Nation Online
MCP lawyers leave court during the ConCourt hearing

They focused on alleged absence of payment receipts as evidence that Chakwera’s case was filed outside the legal period and suggested that the party possibly committed fraud while registering the case.

But in its ruling on June 22 2019, a five-judge Constitutional Court panel of Healey Potani (chair), Dingiswayo Madise, Redson Kapindu, Mike Tembo and Ivy Kamanga ruled against Mutharika and MEC. In turn, the two respondents appealed to the Supreme Court.

But after hearing the respondents’ argument a panel of seven Supreme Court of Appeal judges led by Chief Justice Andrew Nyirenda also dismissed the application with costs and further punched holes in it, citing irregularities in the manner it was filed.

According to court documents Weekend Nation has seen, for the services it rendered in the appeal case, Chakwera’s legal team is demanding K224 917 170 from Mutharika and MEC while Chilima’s lawyers want K122 597 400.

Chakwera’s legal team comprised of Mordecai Msisha, SC; Titus Mvalo, Pempho Likongwe, Isaac Msongea, Innocensia Ottober, Chrispin Ndalama and Charles Mhone while Chilima had Chikosa Silungwe, George Mtchuka Mwale, Bright Theu, Marshall Chilenga and Khumbo Soko.

“The bill of costs is pursuant to order of the court [Supreme] made onthe 15th August 2019,” reads part of the Notice of Appointment for assessment of costs.

The legal bills covered the period the lawyers spent on preparing for the case, court attendance, care and conduct, instruction fee, disbursement, taxation costs and tax and levy.

Lawyers charge their fees per hour and on average an hourly rate for a senior counsel is K60 000, for a lawyer with not less than 10 years is K40 000 and the charge for lawyers with less than 10 years at the bar is K30 000 per hour.

Since the presidential elections case started, Mutharika and MEC have lost several cases at both the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court of Appeal.

For instance, last month the Constitutional Court dismissed an application by the two who wanted it to postpone enforcement of its February 3 2020 ruling on the basis that, among others, claiming that its implementation would have constitutional and financial challenges should their appeal succeed in the Malawi Supreme Court of Appeal.

And just three weeks ago, the Supreme Court threw out an appeal by the two on the same. Nearly all the applications have been dismissed with costs.

on Friday, representatives of legal teams for Chakwera, Chilima, Mutharika and MEC appeared before the senior deputy registrar of the Supreme Court of Appeal and High Court Justus Kishindo for hearing of assessment of the costs.

John Gift Mwakhwawa, who, alongside Charles Mhone, represented Chakwera said in an interview, Kishindo adjourned the hearing after lawyers of MEC and Mutharika requested to file points of dispute.

“So, the court ordered that we should respond to their applications within 21 days from the time they will have filed.

“Basically the court wanted to be better assisted in terms of assessing the costs but we were set to proceed with the hearing. Otherwise, the court will be assisted accordingly on points dispute and our responses,” said Mwakhwawa.

Once the filing has been made, the court will set a new date to hear MEC and APM arguments for disputing.

During the hearing, Bright Theu and George Mtchuka Mwale while Noor Alide and Tamando Chokotho represented Mutharika and MEC, respectively.

The ConCourt ruling nullified May 21, 2019 presidential elections and reverted the presidency positions prior to the polls, demoting Mutharika’s running mate Everton Chimulirenji and reinstating Chilima.

Previous Post

Leadership during a crisis

Next Post

Parliament to re-table rejected electoral bills

Related Posts

Silungwe: Embrace lifestyle audit
National News

AG disowns K750m compensation signature

January 24, 2021
apm | The Nation Online
National News

court rebuffs apm on frozen account

January 24, 2021
Police officers have been ordered to enforce Covid-19 guidelines
National News

Expert cautions police on Covid-19 rules enforcement

January 23, 2021
Next Post
Hara wrote ConCourt on Thursday

Parliament to re-table rejected electoral bills

Trending Stories

  • Not yet given retirement benefits: Mutharika

    Tonse faulted on former presidents’ benefits

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Wasteful Chakwera

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Chakwera has to instill unity

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • High-profile official angered Wirima to quit

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Malawi vs Uganda.

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Opinions and Columns

Bottom Up

Thanks Team Onjezani Kenani; our turn now

January 23, 2021
My Thought

Cloud hangs on Mtambo’s head

January 23, 2021
Off the Shelf

Goodbye Trump, you were a joke

January 23, 2021
Back Bencher

Chakwera’s ‘politics’ rant was in bad taste

January 23, 2021
  • Values
  • Our Philosophy
  • Editorial policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism disclaimer
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2021 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation

© 2020 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.