My Diary

Let us scrutinise all candidates

Listen to this article

There is no question that the twin issues of our day—Cashgate and Jetgate– will have a huge bearing in the way Malawians will vote come May 20.

The ultimate decision will be whether the majority of Malawians have bought into the explanations of the Joyce Banda administration as regards the two issues despite the outright PR fiasco and lies around them or they would have none of it but inflict the ultimate punishment on the ruling party at the ballot.

The President has a record to defend and these two issues have happened on her watch and so it is only right and proper that she accounts fully for them to the Malawian people.

That said, my worry is that it is only the President that is getting all the scrutiny coming through the veil of Cashgate and Jetgate scandals while the other candidates, Lazarus Chakwera, Atupele Muluzi and Peter Mutharika, who are our potential presidents, are having a free ride.

Just imagine, two months before polling day, MCP, UDF and PP have not released their manifestos but all they are doing is talk about the Cashgate on daily basis. Voters do not know a thing that is central to their thinking.

Even on Cashgate, they are not coming out clean on how they will keep the national kitty under lock and key to shut out vultures.

Their spokespersons are still fumbling and fidgeting when asked what is it that they are promising Malawians in return for power that they all so much desire to have.

Make no mistake, as a taxpayer, I am angry that I was paying tax so that somebody could steal it and build villas to bequeath to his children when he or she dies when the money was supposed to buy Panado for my very old grandmother back home in Kasungu.

I am angry as a Malawian at the lies that the PP government peddled on the sale of the presidential jet instead of just being straight that it was bartered and produce receipts on how the proceeds from the money that was saved in the Malawi Defence Force vote, for example, was used.

But I am saying despite of this, I am still hungry for information and pact from the other candidates on what they have to offer. I do not want to hear about Cashgate and Jetgate from them because I know it already.

What I want to hear from them is their own tangible and clear plan on how to curb corruption.

I need to hear from the presidential candidates talk about cost-cutting measures starting with their own presidential expenditures at the State House. I don’t want to hear about a lean Cabinet only but extended to their own extravagance that would come in huge convoys with too many luxurious vehicles, too many State houses and endless travel.

Some of them already go to America as frequently as a lavatory visit. Will this frequency increase with taxpayers’ money picking the tab this time around?

I want to know how many presidential advisers they would have if they won the State House and how such advisers would add value to the presidency as opposed to mere politicking.

What about the economy and general development? How do they intend to take Malawians to the promised land of milk and honey which has eluded them for the past 50 years due to humiliating poverty?

The thing is MCP, UDF and DPP (very corrupt and murderers themselves) cannot define their campaigns using Cashgate and deliberately delay their promises to Malawians in form of manifestos.

It is cheating in broad daylight meant to hoodwink Malawians into giving them power on a cheap. It is being clever and running away from scrutiny.

It should not be allowed at all costs.

Related Articles

One Comment

  1. George Kasakula, your worries as a tax-payer are the central issue here. Why is there no Malawi Tax-Payer Association, who can effectively fron the very real concerns of the Malawian tax-payer?

    I think that would be a key to unlock the current corruption deadlock on political development in the country.

    As we all know, the CABS group is effective at securing their interests. They have an overview of how donor funds are spent. When they loose trust in the overview they have, they swiftly suspend budget support, and order a forensic audit. It works well, but only for them.

    The tax-payer, the backbone of Malawi, is till being fooled. The tax-payer can not easily suspend paying taxes, and, without proper organisation and agency, neither can they force through a forensic audit.

    However, organised tax-payers could change the game. A tax-payer association could secure agency. such an association could demand forensic audits. At least, such an association could demand that government operates with appropriate transparency in all affairs, so that tax-payers and voters can possible monitor the expenditure and bring attention to corruption and waste. There are many other tools, too. Such as the PEFA methodology. Tax-payers could, perhaps should, go on a ‘strike’ while awaiting the implementation of appropriate systems.

    The options are many. And it is certainly about time that Malawians stand up for their own interestes. Why not start with the tax-payers?

Check Also
Close
Back to top button