Tuesday, April 13, 2021
  • About Us
  • ImagiNATION
  • Adverts
  • Rate Card
  • Contact Us
The Nation Online
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Columns Cut the Chaff

Malawi’s economic transformation: What will it take?

by Eric Mtemang’ombe
03/01/2020
in Cut the Chaff
4 min read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedinLinkedinShare via Email

The Vision 2020 Malawi mission statement, which was supposed to be a rallying point for the development of the country, has now become an inspiration for ridicule on social media and self-reflection, among technocrats.

A review of the programme last year confirmed what Malawians have known for a long time; that the policy failed to deliver on its targets. And quite recently, renowned economists and technocrats have revealed two more gaping holes in the policy that undermined its capacity to spur economic transformation.

RelatedHeadlines

Fundamentals going south, but no sign of plan

Fundamentals going south, but no sign of plan

What the hell is APM doing with BJ?

To begin with, the framers of the Constitution did not identify sectors that would anchor and drive economic growth, nor did they set up monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to appraise what was working and what failed to produce results.

In the past 20 years, government has blindly grappled with “reforms” targeting different sectors such as agriculture, mining, tourism and much more recently, mining.

Unfortunately, none have managed to spur the transformation required to transition Malawi into a middle-income economy. This is something that needs to be rectified in the design and development of the Vision 2063.

Naturally, some naysayers have emerged, proclaiming that Malawi does not have the resources or the will to achieve “an overly ambitious dream” of transitioning to a middle-income economy.

I beg to differ. From my vintage point, I strongly feel Malawi has more than enough resources to eradicate extreme poverty in the short-term and yes, even achieve middle-income status by 2063.

All the technocrats at Capital Hill and the consultants advising them need to do is to implement viable and workable reforms to revitalise the foundations that were built during implementation of the 20-year period Vision 2020 was operational.

Granted, it might not be a strong foundation but it is still something the country can build on. Like all, agrarian economies, Malawi should base its economic growth on agriculture in the short-term with view to industrialising in the medium and long-term.

A lot of resources have already been channelled towards the agriculture sector. In the current budget, government allocated K35.5 billion to the Farm Input Subsidy Programme (Fisp) to subsidise production for 900 000 farmers.

The only problem with the Fisp, in its current iteration, is that there is a lot of expenditure that is going into consumption. The first reform option could be to channel this expenditure to areas in the agricultural sector that can guarantee a viable return on investment or at the very least ensure that the beneficiaries graduate from the programme.

If these funds were channelled into promoting irrigation and mechanised agriculture to agricultural cooperatives, there is a strong likelihood that government would increase production at least two-fold; hence, promote food security.

To cap it all off, the targeted groups of farmers would have the machinery in subsequent seasons, leaving funds available to target different groups every year or cycle and subsequently reduce their dependence on government subsidies. We would be increasing the scope of coverage instead of reducing the number of beneficiaries.

As a second reformatory measure, government can target farmers in subsectors with larger value chains and the capacity to spur economic activity in subsectors with readily available markets to mitigate against risk.

As it stands now, government and the private sector have been investing in cotton ginning to promote value addition. Considering that we have government agencies such as the police, immigration services, public hospitals, primary and secondary schools that use uniforms, there is a vast untapped market for this sector.

All that is needed is a procurement reform to ensure that these agencies are buying from local suppliers; hence, kickstart Malawi’s drive towards import substitution.

From a layman’s perspective, I think these are workable policy and procurement reforms that would inch us closer to eradicating poverty with resources that are currently available ad are already being invested in the economy.

In the medium term, Malawi can focus on developing the infrastructural sector. As it stands now, there is a high demand for housing and office space in urban and semi-urban areas. Why not invest in the struggling Malawi Housing Corporation (MHC) to meet this demand and generate a profit along the way. These profits that can be channelled to other areas such as public service delivery and all.

All in all, economic transformation is possible, it just needs the right policy to ensure that available funds are channelled to profitable areas and productive areas.

Avatar
Eric Mtemang’ombe
Previous Post

Are you making the best use of your mental maths skills?

Next Post

Quota fighters have a dinosaur to fight

Related Posts

Cut the Chaff

Fundamentals going south, but no sign of plan

March 27, 2021
Cut the Chaff

Fundamentals going south, but no sign of plan

March 20, 2021
Asked for more
time: Mpinganjira
Cut the Chaff

What the hell is APM doing with BJ?

February 27, 2021
Next Post

Quota fighters have a dinosaur to fight

Opinions and Columns

Political Uncensored

Managing the dream

April 11, 2021
My Thought

Malawi needs fixing, not politicking

April 11, 2021
People’s Tribunal

Don’t intimidate Nyasaland Union of Teachers

April 11, 2021
Emily Mkamanga

Longevity in power no solution

April 11, 2021
https://www.mwnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WFP-Afikepo-1-2.pdf https://www.mwnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WFP-Afikepo-1-2.pdf https://www.mwnation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/WFP-Afikepo-1-2.pdf

Trending Stories

  • Malawi Airlines is yet to post a profit since it took to the skies

    Malawi Airlines faces liquidation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Covid-19 measures relaxed, bars open till late

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • After hypocrisy MCP, UTM will part ways

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Businesses say can’t breathe

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Court favours Unima on virtual graduation

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Values
  • Our Philosophy
  • Editorial policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism disclaimer
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2021 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation

© 2020 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.