Wednesday, March 3, 2021
  • About Us
  • ImagiNATION
  • Adverts
  • Rate Card
  • Contact Us
The Nation Online
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
Home Columns In pursuit of development

Post-election blues?

by Dan Banik
23/05/2019
in In pursuit of development
2 min read
0
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsAppShare on LinkedinLinkedinShare via Email

 

As I write this column in Oslo on Tuesday evening, millions of Malawians have participated in a much-anticipated election process, the outcome of which promises to be exciting in the days and weeks ahead.

RelatedHeadlines

The Chinese approach to network-building

The ethics of vaccine distribution

Greening aid

What is clear is that whoever wins must work closely with the bureaucracy that was not up for election.

The successful formulation and implementation of public policy in any country requires the presence of a well-functioning administrative apparatus. A major challenge in many low-income country settings is entrenched patrimonialism and nepotism, which hinders merit-based recruitment of competent civil servants.

Addressing this challenge requires a strong political commitment to undertake major (and often unpopular) administrative reforms that risk being opposed by powerful actors, including bureaucrats who fear the loss of their privileged positions.

In large parts of the world, bureaucrats complain of low salaries and increased political interference in administrative activities which, they claim, undermines bureaucratic initiative and neutrality, and is a major source of demotivation in the civil service. Politicians are accused of fostering a culture of clientelism with the aim of appeasing their supporters and loyalists, who may be granted special privileges and access to a disproportionate share of government benefits.

And bureaucrats who refuse to bend the rules in favour of their political masters may risk administrative transfers to unattractive posts far from urban centres (so-called “punishment postings” or “thankless postings”) and delays in receiving promotions. However, this is not just a one-way process.

Bureaucrats also seek favours from politicians in the hope of furthering their careers by being posted to so-called “wet posts” (attractive ministries with large budgets).

Civil servants most likely to be demotivated include officers who are disliked by the political leadership (either those who are seen to be loyal to a rival politician or party, or a person who is perceived to be incorruptible); and those without ‘political clout’, i.e. officers who are politically not well-connected and thus cannot influence their posting.

And bureaucrats who have been ‘victimised’ by the ruling party typically long for a change of government, the rationale being that with new ministers at the helm, those marginalised or punished by the previous regime would be suitably rewarded with prized postings in larger (more urban) districts or in the capital city.

The growth of an unholy nexus between a number of corrupt politicians, private contractors and disloyal bureaucrats contributes to an enormous wastage of public resources and continued difficulties in implementing development programmes. But ‘political interference’ can also have a positive influence on public policy.

Without sustained political support, bureaucrats tend to implement ad hoc policies, without being in a position to radically reform projects, programmes and policies with inherent, and often well-known, shortcomings.

 

Previous Post

Beat your competition

Next Post

Hoes, ploughs and tractors

Related Posts

In pursuit of development

The Chinese approach to network-building

February 25, 2021
FILE PHOTO: Vials with a sticker reading, "COVID-19 / Coronavirus vaccine / Injection only" and a medical syringe are seen in front of a displayed AstraZeneca logo in this illustration taken October 31, 2020. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
In pursuit of development

The ethics of vaccine distribution

February 17, 2021
In pursuit of development

Greening aid

February 3, 2021
Next Post
Hoe-free: A farmer uses a plough in a maize field

Hoes, ploughs and tractors

Opinions and Columns

My Turn

Unmasking Covid-19 vaccine

March 3, 2021
My Turn

Tackling global slowdowns

March 1, 2021
People’s Tribunal

Burglary at the hill

February 28, 2021
Search Within

Perseverance landed, is alive and well

February 28, 2021

Trending Stories

  • Under probe: The Reserve Bank building in Mzuzu

    Exclusive: RBM’s Mzuzu branch payment mess exposed

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • K5bn Sunbird Waterfront hotel opens May

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Lhomwe chiefs divided on paramount chief

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Inside Chisale’s seized property

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Experts fault IFMIS roll-out delays

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Values
  • Our Philosophy
  • Editorial policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Code of Conduct
  • Plagiarism disclaimer
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use

© 2021 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Life & Style
    • Every Woman
      • Soul
      • Family
    • Religion
    • Feature
  • Society
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Chichewa
  • Enation

© 2020 Nation Publications Limited. All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.